• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Strata-gee
  • Contact Us
  • Free Newsletter
  • Sponsor Strata-gee
  • Privacy Policy
  • Latest Posts
  • Strategy
  • Technology
  • Products
  • People
  • Statistics
  • Financial
  • Legal
  • Economic Data
  • Shows & Events

Strata-gee.com

Strategy in TECH...

Sonance James Small Aperture Series
You are here: Home / Law / Monster & Noel Lee Must Pay Beats Nearly $8M in Legal Fees

Monster & Noel Lee Must Pay Beats Nearly $8M in Legal Fees

January 4, 2018 by Ted Leave a Comment

On a Roll, Beats Files New Lawsuit Against Monster Seeking $100 Million

Photo of Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine
Dr. Dre & Jimmy Iovine of Beats

While you were drinking your eggnog or otherwise enjoying your holidays, the Grinch stole all the good cheer from Monster LLC and owner Noel Lee when a jury in the case of Monster LLC v. Beats, et al agreed with Beats and ordered Monster and  Lee to pay them $7,916,201.64 as reimbursement for their legal expenses.

And Beats has more bad news for the Monster camp…



According to a report by Law360, the jury took just 20 minutes to make its decision, awarding Beats the total amount of legal fees it requested in successfully defending itself from claims of attempting to squeeze Monster and Lee out of its $3.2 billion acquisition by Apple. The amount awarded was largely earmarked for parent Apple, who footed the bill from nationally renowned law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP.

When we last reported on this dispute, it was September 2016, and the judge had just thrown out Monster’s entire case in a summary judgment award for Beats. At that point, the judge completely turned the table on Monster and determined that the only thing left to be decided was the amount of legal fees Monster would need to pay Beats.

Sonance James Small Aperture

Turning the Tables on Monster

The process of awarding legal fees to the winner, although certainly provided by legal statute, is actually pretty unusual to have happen. Generally speaking, the courts in this country are biased towards allowing you to have your day in court, whether you win or lose. However, in certain circumstances where the judge feels one side was unreasonable in bringing their action, he can award reimbursement for legal fees – and that is just what Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William F. Fahey decided to do.

Photo of Noel Lee
Noel Lee at a past CE Line Show

An actual trial was held where both sides had the opportunity to make their case to the jury as to what constitutes reasonable fees in the matter. Monster’s attorney revealed that they had charged their client $360,000 in total fees…suggesting that the Boies Schiller’s $7.9 million fee was ridiculously large.

Not surprisingly, Beats’ attorney went to great lengths to justify their fees, showing actual billing statements and explaining the level of research and the total number of people who worked in helping defend Beats against the Monster charges. The Beats case carried the day – and the award reflected the total costs of their defense.

New Lawsuit: Beats Electronics LLC v. Monster LLC

If all of that news wasn’t bad enough for Monster, after their win in 2016, Beats turned around and sued Monster LLC in July 2017 for breach of contract. In this case, known as Beats Electronics, LLC v. Monster, LLC, says that Monster has violated a distribution agreement between the two companies, dating from June 2012.

Savant

According to the Beats complaint, the distribution agreement included a fairly standard audit clause, which states that Beats has the option to have Monster’s distribution business audited to determine if it has fairly paid Beats what it truly owes for sales of their products. The auditor would be selected by mutual agreement, and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) was engaged to conduct just such audit.

Independent Auditor Says Monster Shorted Beats…By a Lot



This audit, it appears, took three years to complete, and was only now completed on July 21, 2017. The independent auditor determined that Monster shorted Beats in this relationship to the tune of $71,220,915 (U.S. dollars); €20,065,036 (Euros), and $716,107 (Canadian dollars). These amounts total, based on the exchange rates in effect at the time, to about  $95 million.

Beats immediately and repeatedly sent demand letters for this payment, but say they have never received any kind of a response from Monster – even though the distribution agreement states that payment will be made within five days of the conclusion of the audit. This lawsuit demands the court order Monster to pay full restitution including the amounts shown above, all accrued interest, attorneys’ fees and other costs, as well as other unspecified damages.

Monster initially entered a general denial to the charges. And then Monster took what could have been a risky step. It turns out that this case was assigned to the exact same judge, William F. Fahey, who presided over the Monster v. Beats matter in which he ultimately sided with Beats.

Facing Same Judge, Monster Demands Judge Recuse Himself

Beats logoMonster filed a “Peremptory Challenge to Judicial Officer,” in an attempt to force a reassignment to a different judge. In their filing, Monster says that “the judicial officer” in this case, Fahey, “is prejudiced against the party…so that declarant cannot, or believes that he or she cannot, have a fair and impartial trial or hearing before the judicial officer.”

Ironically, in matters like this, a challenge to a judge is made to that judge. This challenge to Judge Fahey’s objectivity, was approved by Fahey, and the matter was sent back to the court for reassignment.

One Thing We Know, L.A. Superior Court Says the Agreements are Enforceable



So we are at the start of another lawsuit between the parties that could take considerable time to determine. However, with the favorable ruling by the courts in the last matter, Beats has significant wind in their sails. One very important fact for them was that Judge Fahey determined that the agreements that exist between the parties are all intact and enforceable. The judge also determined that Lee and Monster entered into these agreements fully understanding their rights and restrictions.

How will Monster defend themselves? That remains to be seen, but it doesn’t appear likely that they will be able to successfully impeach the agreements…that much, at least, is settled.

See more on Beats and its products at: www.beatsbydre.com.

Learn all about Monster and its extensive line at: www.monsterproducts.com.


Share this post:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Filed Under: Law Tagged With: Beats, Beats by Dr. Dre, Beats Electronics, Dr. Dre, Head Monster, Jimmie Iovine, litigation, Monster, Noel Lee

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign-Up for Our FREE Newsletter

loader

Latest Posts

T-Day+1: Tariffs…And So It Begins…

**UPDATED 5/22/25** - See a Selection of Tariff Increases from Around the … [Read More...] about T-Day+1: Tariffs…And So It Begins…

In Its Boldest Move Yet, AVPro Global Acquires Control Solutions Maker RTI

We got a blockbuster announcement late this afternoon as AVPro Global announced … [Read More...] about In Its Boldest Move Yet, AVPro Global Acquires Control Solutions Maker RTI

  • T-Day+1: Tariffs…And So It Begins…
  • ‘Legendary’ Judge Alsup Featured in Strata-gee May Go ‘Inactive’ in 2025
  • Masimo Updates SEC on Its Progress Recovering From Recent Cyberattack
  • Harman Hits Voxx Int’l & Klipsch Group with Major 13-Count Lawsuit

Categories

Sponsors

Crestron Infra-Bass
AudioControl Single Zone Amps
Sonance James Small Aperture
Savant
Oasys Residential Technology Group

Tag Cloud

acquisition Amazon Apple AudioControl B&W Bowers & Wilkins CEDIA CEDIA Expo CES Control4 Core Brands COVID-19 Crestron D&M Holdings Denon Emerald Expositions Foxconn Gibson Brands Gibson Guitar Google Henry Juszkiewicz Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. housing starts Integra Joe Kiani LG Marantz Masimo Nortek OLED Onkyo Panasonic patent infringement Pioneer Samsung Savant Sharp smart home SnapAV Snap One Sonos Sony Sound United SpeakerCraft Toshiba

Footer

Got News?

HEY PR & Marketing Pros: Have NEWS for Strata-gee readers?

Send it to: HotNews@strata-gee.com

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Sponsor Strata-gee

Strata-gee Ads

Archives

Translate

Ted Green Bio

A former dealer, manufacturer, distributor & more. Focusing on business strategy, my goal is to help you make better decisions for greater success.

Follow Ted Green

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Copyright © 2025 Strata-gee.com · The Stratecon Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved · Log in

%d