• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Strata-gee
  • Contact Us
  • Free Newsletter
  • Sponsor Strata-gee
  • Privacy Policy
  • Latest Posts
  • Strategy
  • Technology
  • Products
  • People
  • Statistics
  • Financial
  • Legal
  • Economic
  • Events

Strata-gee.com

Strategy in TECH...

Sonance James Small Aperture Series
You are here: Home / Law / A Jury Finds that Dish Network Must Pay $470M for Patent Infringement

A Jury Finds that Dish Network Must Pay $470M for Patent Infringement

March 16, 2023 by Ted Leave a Comment

A Dish Network webpage pitching Autohop - a jury says this infringes on a ClearPlay patent

Dish Network, LLC must pay nearly $470 million for patent infringement related to its Autohop Hopper technology that a Salt Lake City District Court jury says infringes on patents held by ClearPlay Inc. The case, originally filed as ClearPlay, Inc. vs. Dish Network LLC, Dish Network Corp., EchoStar Corp., and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. has been a long-running battle as it was originally filed in March 2014.

Learn more about Dish Network ordered to pay $470 million

Last week, in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, a jury found Dish Network infringed on patents held by ClearPlay. The trial was presided over by the Honorable District Judge David Nuffer and ran several days as both sides passionately argued their case.

At issue is a technology invented by ClearPlay that was designed to filter out or otherwise remove certain objectionable material from DVDs or streaming sources such as adult content, sex, violence, and drug use – whatever the viewer finds objectionable. ClearPlay held several patents governing the technology.

Sonance James Small Aperture

ClearPlay Previewed Their Technology for Dish in Early 2000s

According to the original complaint, in the early 2000s ClearPlay had shown this technology to Dish and even provided them with a DVD player that had their technology on board. The company also noted that one of their patent attorneys had even left the company to work with EchoStar, an affiliated company of Dish.

Then in 2012, Dish launched its Hopper DVR which contained a feature called Autohop – a technology that allows users to skip commercials. This technology also found its way into Dish set-top boxes as well. ClearPlay sued Dish, alleging that its Autohop feature was clearly based upon and therefore infringes upon existing ClearPlay patents, and initially asserted claims against ten separate patents.

A Really Long-Running Piece of Patent Litigation; Dish Succeeded in Nullifying Some Patents

This is one of the longest patent infringement disputes that I’ve ever seen. Dish responded to the ClearPlay suit by immediately challenging the validity of the ten patents claimed, an arduous process in which a patent challenge is filed with the Patent Office and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

ClearPlay home page [Click to enlarge]

Dish was successful in nullifying some of the patents asserted. Yet after a series of actions, then appeals, Dish was not successful in getting all of them nullified. Neither was it successful in asserting its own claims of patent infringement – where it claimed that ClearPlay actually violated some Dish Patents.

Sonance James Small Aperture

PTAB and the Courts Cleared the Way to Move Forward

Ultimately the PTAB and the courts cleared the way for the company to move forward on an amended complaint, asserting three claims of violations of two of ClearPlay’s original ten patents – U.S. Patent No. 7,577,970 (“the ‘970 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,898,799 (“the ‘799 Patent”). It was this case that finally went to trial and was decided last week, with the jury finding on behalf of ClearPlay that Dish had in fact infringed on these patents.

However, it was not a total win for ClearPlay. One of the issues that the jury had to settle was based upon this question: “Has ClearPlay proven by a preponderance of the evidence that DISH actively induces infringement of any of the following ClearPlay patent claims?” For each of the three claims, on this question the jury said “No.”

Heading for ClearPlay vs. Dish Network
Part of the cover page of the jury Verdict Form in CLEARPLAY INC., V. DISH NETWORK L.L.C., AND ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES L.L.C.

Jury had to Decide Two Important Questions

Also, the jury needed to determine another important question: “Has ClearPlay proven by a preponderance of the evidence that DISH’s infringement was willful?” Again, the jury answered “No” on each of the patents in question. This likely reduced the potential size of the royalties that ClearPlay could reasonably expect to be awarded.

With that, the jury calculated a “reasonable royalty” of $469,074,468. The method the jury used to come to that total was not revealed on the Verdict form.

Dish is ‘Disappointed’ and Plans to Appeal

A Dish spokesperson told the Reuters News Agency that they were “disappointed” with the jury’s decision and intend to appeal the verdict. Dish further told Reuters that Autohop works differently than ClearPlay’s patents describe and further claim that the patents are invalid, saying that the patents are obvious based on previous inventions.

Of course, Dish likely already argued those issues with the PTAB.

Learn more about ClearPlay by visiting clearplay.com.

See what Dish Network has to offer at dish.com.

Share this post:

  • Tweet
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

In a Shocking Reversal, Judge Grants Dish Motion; Throws Out Jury Verdict

BREAKING NEWS On Tuesday, less than two weeks after the conclusion of a trial in the case of ClearPlay, Inc. vs. Dish Network where a jury found in favor of ClearPlay and ordered Dish Network to pay $470 million for patent infringement - Judge David Nuffer announced a new ruling…

March 21, 2023

In "Financial"

Throwing Shade – Jury Finds Lutron Guilty of Infringement; Owes J. Geiger $34.6M

A Federal jury in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York delivered a verdict against Lutron Electronics Co., finding that it had infringed on a window shade patent held by GeigTech East Bay, a South Carolina company. The jury awarded GeigTech $34.6 million in damages for…

April 25, 2024

In "Law"

Jury Sides with Sonos, Orders Google to Pay $32.5m for Infringement

From the Verdict Form in Sonos, Inc. v. Google, LLC A jury has come to a unanimous verdict in the matter of Sonos, Inc. vs. Google, LLC, a patent infringement lawsuit initially filed on September 22, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for California Northern District in San Francisco. In…

May 30, 2023

In "Law"

Filed Under: Financial, Law, News Tagged With: ClearPlay, Dish Network, patent infringement

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign-Up for Our FREE Newsletter

loader

Latest Posts

Mystery Solved! Former Masimo Director Now at Medtronic, a Major Competitor

I wrote last week about the sudden announcement from Masimo Corporation (Nasdaq: … [Read More...] about Mystery Solved! Former Masimo Director Now at Medtronic, a Major Competitor

  • It’s Official, AVPro Global is One of the Fastest Growing Companies in America, Says Inc. 5000
  • 8K Association Goes Big at CEDIA Expo 2025 with Exhibits, Presentations & Panels
  • Masimo Loses Another Board Member in an Unexpected Resignation; Motive is a Mystery

Categories

Sponsors

Crestron Register for Expo
AudioControl Single Zone Amps
Sonance James Small Aperture
Savant

Tag Cloud

acquisition Amazon Apple AudioControl B&W Bowers & Wilkins CEDIA CEDIA Expo CES Control4 Core Brands COVID-19 Crestron D&M Holdings Denon Emerald Expositions Foxconn Gibson Brands Gibson Guitar Google headphones Henry Juszkiewicz Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. housing starts Integra Joe Kiani LG Masimo Nortek OLED Onkyo Panasonic patent infringement Pioneer Samsung Savant Sharp smart home SnapAV Snap One Sonos Sony Sound United SpeakerCraft Toshiba

Footer

Got News?

HEY PR & Marketing Pros: Have NEWS for Strata-gee readers?

Send it to: HotNews@strata-gee.com

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Sponsor Strata-gee

Strata-gee Ads

Archives

Translate

Ted Green Bio

A former dealer, manufacturer, distributor & more. Focusing on business strategy, my goal is to help you make better decisions for greater success.

Follow Ted Green

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Copyright © 2025 Strata-gee.com · The Stratecon Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved · Log in

%d